The More The Merrier?

Post by **caquernham** » 5 years ago

Do y'all prefer intimate, 1-on-1 tie up games, or are they more fun in a group? If in a group, do you prefer ganging up on a single victim, or collecting a cabal of captives?

Post by **DeeperThanRed** » 5 years ago

They all have their merits:

One-on-one feels more intimate and intense.

One-on-many has the feeling of making a collection.

And many-on-one is great at making the victim feel helpless.

Many-on-many can be good, but I personally find it a bit hard to follow to be much enjoyable.

Post by **caquernham** » 5 years ago

Ooh, one of the most intense situations I've ever been in was one where I watched some classmates try to duct tape someone unsuccessfully, and then we all just sort of stood around giving each other shifty glances, like "who's gonna be our next victim..."

It fizzled out after a bit and nobody ended up tied up, but it was an incredible feeling not knowing what would happen next...

Post by **BindPam** » 5 years ago

caquernham wrote: ↑5 years ago Do y'all prefer intimate, 1-on-1 tie up games, or are they more fun in a group? If in a group, do you prefer ganging up on a single victim, or collecting a cabal of captives?

One on one is perfect for both intimacy and just goofing around; I do have a fantasy about being overpowered by two men, but I don't think that's what you mean...

More than two wouldn't interest me.

Post by **drawscore** » 5 years ago

A little of each, I guess. When growing up, we all thought that being tied with a friend (or even a rival), was more fun than being tied alone. But it sometimes was a quandary. When, in the course of a game, I was tied alone, and the other team brought in a second captive, I didn't know whether to be happy that I'd have company, or pissed off that my teammate got himself captured, and couldn't rescue me from my captivity.

Drawscore

Post by **Amm1973es** » 5 years ago

I also consider that one by one is the best, maximum one to two.
Beyond that many stories end up becoming boring given the large number of characters.

Post by **bondagefreak** » 5 years ago

Many-on-one is definitely my choice.

Post by **Exelsia** » 5 years ago

I second [mention]DeeperThanRed[/mention]'s notion. They are all to my preference except many-on-many.

For one-on-one, I prefer it be a romantic scene to make the most of the private and intimate setting.

One-on-many can have achieve the same effect as one-on-one if there's only 2 captive involved. If there are more than 2, I'd enjoy a scene where each of them try to work together towards freedom... or helplessly look at each other in despair.

For many-on-one, the feeling of being thoroughly dominated is what I aim to reach, with the chances of escape being obviously zilch.

Post by **Nexus** » 5 years ago

One on one is always fun.

One on many (me collecting captives) has always been a fantasy of mine. So for me most definitely yes, the more the merrier.

Post by **Emma** » 5 years ago

It would be one on one for me

Post by **RaeGray4477** » 4 years ago

One on one and many on one are both equally as appealing to me but I’ve tried a TUG with multiples being tied so it’s hard to say for me

Post by **Kyle** » 4 years ago

Most of my own personal experiences have been one-on-one. I do like the idea of someone being ganged up on, jumped, and bound, though.

Post by **DallasNotAustin** » 4 years ago

Many on one is probably my go to. Being bound at the hands of so many people who can watch me try to escape is very enticing. One on one is great too though, it’s a lot more intimate. I am a bit of an attention lover though, so being bound with someone doesn’t really appeal to me

Stories of Tie Up Games